Maddenation
What’s wrong with the NBA
New York Times writer Michael Sokolove writes about the state of the NBA in his article, Clang!, where he lashes out against “basket stuffing”, the maturity of players, the three-pointer, and the Team USA 2004 Olympic performance, while suggesting rule changes to get the professional game back to how it should be: Watchable.
If you’ve watched a regular season NBA game during the past few years, chances are you haven’t seen much of that game. Maybe 5 minutes? I’ve said for years that the NBA isn’t worth watching until the 2nd round of the playoffs, a statement echoed on Pardon the Interruption, ESPN’s fantastic sports-debate show.
I won’t rant because Sokolove’s article says everything I would say and much more. Some points he makes:
The N.B.A. doesn’t have a thug problem; it has a basketball problem. Its players are the best athletes in all of pro sports — oversize, swift and agile — but weirdly they are also the first to have devolved to a point where they can no longer play their own game
Richard Hamilton of the Detroit Pistons, last year’s N.B.A. champion, has been just about knighted for his ability to consistently sink the ”midrange” jumper, which used to be an entry-level requirement into the N.B.A.
Rod Thorn, the president of the Nets, told me, ”We have better athletes than ever, but they play at a slower pace. The reason is they’re not as sound fundamentally, so the coaches feel that the faster they play, the more mistakes they’ll make.”
An industry of tout sheets and recruiting services identifies (the best players) as early as fifth or sixth grade, and they begin traveling a nationwide circuit of tournaments with their high-powered youth teams. In the summer, the best high-school players attend showcases sponsored by the big sneaker companies. Quite understandably, these young stars, rather than being prone to sharing the ball, are apt to believe they own it. ”I’m amazed when guys make it out of that system with any sense of perspective at all,” said Jeff Van Gundy, the former Knicks coach now coaching the Houston Rockets. ”It’s not natural to be that catered to at such a young age. We’ve got kids being named the ‘best 11-year-old basketball player in America.’ How the hell do you recover from that?”
One night earlier this season at the press table at Madison Square Garden, I was seated next to Jeff Lenchiner, the editor of InsideHoops.com, an online magazine for basketball aficionados. During a lull in the game, he turned his laptop computer toward me and directed me to watch an electronic file of Stephon Marbury highlights, an array of breathtaking moves: crossover dribbles that left defenders looking as if they were stuck in cement; spinning, twisting drives to the basket; soaring dunks. The last clip showed the 6-foot-2 Marbury rising up for a jump shot over a taller defender. At his peak, just as the ball left his hand, his sneakers looked to be about three feet above the floor. ”Look at him!” Lenchiner shouted. ”It’s like he’s in a video game. He’s got thrusters!”
Marbury this year publicly proclaimed himself the best point guard in the N.B.A. The Knicks promptly lost 14 of their next 16 games, and the coach, Lenny Wilkins, resigned along the way.
Foul shooting is generally regarded as a matter of discipline and repetition. With enough practice, most players can become proficient. It’s worth noting that in Athens, the gold-medal-winning U.S. women’s team made 76 percent of its foul shots while the men connected on a woeful 67 percent.
As the Spurs took the floor for a November game in San Antonio against the Knicks, I looked in my program and noted the backgrounds of the players in their starting lineup. Rasho Nesterovic is from Slovenia; Tony Parker, from France; Manu Ginobili, star of the gold-medal-winning Olympic team, from Argentina; and Tim Duncan, the Spurs power forward and best player, from St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Among the Spurs starters, only Bruce Bowen was born on United States soil, and he spent four years after college toiling for minor-league teams in the U.S. and on the European pro circuit.
snapshot from today’s N.B.A.: the locker room of the New York Knicks, where in each dressing cubicle a necktie hangs on a hook, pre-knotted. Isiah Thomas, the team president, has ordered players to wear suits and ties to the arenas, a grown-up enough thing. But during games, a team functionary goes around knotting the ties so that when a player gets dressed afterward, all he has to do is slip the tie over his head and tighten it rather than actually having to make the knot himself.Dan • Observations • 02/17/05 • 8 comments

Comments
Patrick • 02/17/05 • 1:29 PM:Those are all pretty interesting notes, and it may be appalling that the Knicks have tie-knotters, but that doesn’t really say much about their ability to play basketball, which is what we’re focusing on here, right? Now, if they had Velcro sneakers because they couldn’t tie their laces, that might affect their playing.
Dad • 02/17/05 • 2:02 PM:Are they tie-knotters or knot-tiers? (I know, tie-knotters is much better.) In any event, it does say something about the pampered lives these players lead and have lead all their lives. Basketball today doesn’t look much like the game Dr. James Naismith invented in 1891. It has evolved in response to various pressures, most recently the money of the NBA (and indirectly, the NCAA). Players currently play the game they think the NBA and its fans want. The fact that teams are going overseas to recruit is part of the globalization we all love. When the fans falter, the game will have to respond, and that change (if it happens) will eventually filter down to the little grandstanding jerks currently playing in the midget leagues.
Dan • 02/17/05 • 5:40 PM:Pat, I think the section about the “lost art” of the mid-range jumpshot raises an eyebrow about the quality of player in the NBA. The tie-knotters comment is an aside that is more of a low blow than anything. The article has some serious merit. Sure, his rule-change suggestions won’t happen, but I sure couldn’t win a debate against him.
The game hasn’t looked like Naismith’s game in 100 years, but we all know it’s looked a lot better. I’m surprised Sokolove doesn’t mention the referees’ roles in the declining league. For how many years have they not called traveling? And speaking of rule changes, how about that “dotted line” on the floor just below the rim? That says that you can’t play defense there. Why? So that players get more high-flying dunks.
Disgusting.
Dan • 02/17/05 • 5:43 PM:And by the way, how awesome is that picture that starts the article?! I love it.
Dad • 02/18/05 • 8:03 AM:On a scale of 9 to 10 it’s really quite good.
David • 02/18/05 • 7:08 PM:I think they need to do a better comparison between USA and Europe hoops. They don’t have a “No-Dunking” rule and they shoot lots of threes over there(maybe more than the US? I don’t know).
I thought the article was right on and very convincing. I could even see myself voting for a no-dunk rule. However, I don’t think the author fully explores the changes and the causes (from Wilt’s era to the Magic/Larry era blending to the MJ era and now to the Carlos Boozer era). I mean - the two most popular players lately (last decade), MJ and Lebron, are two of the best pure basketball players of all-time (if you disagree with Lebron, just wait). How come they are so good and so right? What makes them so different? It just seems hard blame the problem on sneakers when the two biggest sneakers deal signers (MJ, LJ) are not part of the problem. You know?
Oh yeah, the part about videogameizing our lives, and our pro sports, is a good one. That makes the most sense to me. What I want to know is this - has the NBA’s viewership and fanbase really gone down? Or is it just among people like us? It seems like kids are not as interested and it seems to be on major TV less frequently. Right? I mean, the All-Star game is on TNT, not even a real station.
Maybe Michael Moore can do a documentary to help answer some of these questions.
I like the part about the midrange jumper. And no three pointers would be an excellent idea.
In closing - I don’t like Stephon Marbury much and he is not the best point guard.
Patrick • 02/19/05 • 1:42 PM:I coincidentally just found video of the INSANE Vince Carter dunk over that Croat guy (or wherever he was from). When I see it, I think “that was a charge.”
David • 02/19/05 • 2:20 PM:When I see it I don’t know how to think. It HAS to be one of the single greatest athletic feats of all time. No exaggeration. I mean, man! Did you watch the video? How was that possible? The guy he jumped over was like 7 feet tall. What I want to know is what was going through Vinsanity’s mind as he picked up his dribble and decided to jump. I have got to believe that no one (including Vince) would/could have ever thought, “Hey, there’s a 7 footer standing on the box, directly between me and the hoop. Okay, why not try leaping completely over him and slamming the ball with ferocious thunder?” No way! I imagine he just sort of did it. (Also, that was not a charge - if anything, they should’ve awarded Vince like 20 points for the shot - or it could’ve been awarded “So Dang Good, You Just Won The Whole Game Because of THAT!” status.
There are other plays in the history of sports (and the world) where people did fantastically crazy things. Stuff that the mind couldn’t possibly have planned out or visualized. Jason Sehorn’s interception comes to mind. All of Michael Vick’s runs. I’m sure guys back in the old days had some during those epic battles like in Braveheart - you know, where the bad guys just can’t seem to hit you with their arrows and you’re slaying dozens of evil-doers like they’re warm butter? And I bet guys like Zorro and Batman and Bruce Lee had those kinds of moments all the time - which is maybe what makes them superheroes.
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
Please capitalize your name properly and use the same information each time you comment. We will not send you spam, and your email address will not be posted.